Showing posts with label Two-party system. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Two-party system. Show all posts

Monday, 9 November 2009

The ‘Vote Conservative -- they Oppose the Multicult’ meme

Sarah, Maid of Albion put up a very good blog at her site and at Green Arrow’s urging people not to fall into the trap of voting for the establishment party/ies again now that they are talking the right game on immigration.

Of course, we have been here before, the last time that our politicians were forced to address the subject of immigration during the months leading up to an election, thirty years ago, in 1979.

Usually, all political parties comply with a secret pact whereby none of them mention the subject of immigration before an election, because they all have the same failed policy, and they do not want it discussed. However, this time, the growing popularity of the BNP, means that they have no option other than to address the subject and start lying through their expensively capped, tax payer funded teeth.

Voters over 50 will have seen this before, in the lead up to the 1979 election, the then opposition leader Margaret Thatcher gave a famous TV interview to the “World in Action” program during which she alluded to the fears in many communities that they could become "rather swamped by people of a different culture".

Thatcher was widely condemned, even then controlled media, for using the word “swamped” but she used it deliberately, and as cynically as Johnson used his words at the Royal Society.

Like Johnson, Thatcher had no intention of changing immigration policy, but she fooled enough people into into believing she would that they voted for her, rather than the National Front, and she won with a majority of 43 and the rest is history.

The BNP is not the National Front, but the issues and the Lib/Lab/Con troika are the same as they were in 1979, just much worse. Do not let history repeat itself, do not be fooled again.


This is an especially important message going into the next election because now that it’s become clear that Labour will not win the MSM are strongly pushing the idea that mass-immigration has been a peculiarly Labourite obsession, suggesting that the Tories, had they been in power, would have acted differently. Nothing could be further from the truth. Race-replacement migration has been every bit as much a Tory program as a Labour one and will remain so. Right-liberals have no more grounds on which to say ‘this far but no further’ than left-liberals, and so never do say ‘no further’ -- much less, ‘let’s back up a little.’

Recently I came across this quote in a Times opinion piece discussing Birmingham City Council’s plan to rehouse immigrants suffering from overcrowding, in accomodation that otherwise would have gone to Brits who had been waiting on housing lists, often for long periods of time:

What are likely to be the feelings of 50,000 white would-be tenants in Birmingham, who have waited years for a decent house, when they see newcomers, no matter what their colour, taking over whole streets of properties?


It was published on November 8th, no, not yesterday - November 8th, 1954. Nothing changes! Churchill was PM then, and in the 55 years since the Tories have been in power for 31 and we’ve had six more Conservative Prime Ministers, every one of whom made the situation worse. Will the boobs be fooled again? Will they vote Tory in part because they believe it will halt our dispossession? Millions will, but I predict that for the first time more than a million won’t be fooled, and shall vote for a party that means it -- not only on immigration but on other issues close to all social-conservatives’ hearts.

Wednesday, 17 June 2009

Young, gifted and White? No... but one out of three ain't too bad.

By chance I caught a snatch of the Radio 2 documentary last night about the anti-Thatcher protest music of the eighties. I really only heard presenter Jeremy Vine say that next week’s episode will feature music by artists who supported Thatcher(ism); balance you see. Giving equal air time to pro- and anti-Thatcher pop musicians despite the antis outnumbering the pros by, what? 100 to 1? will seem to many listeners to be proof of the BBC’s integrity and cause for celebration. In fact the stretch reveals something else: the beeb’s determination to present a seemingly comprehensive survey of political ideas while never venturing outside the establishment-safe right- and left-liberal options, all the while encouraging us to pick a side with which to stand, to get involved in the charade.

Half of the beeb’s job is to appear to the public as having no party loyalties and no political prejudices of its own; the other half is to systematically promote the establishment parties and the supposed conflict between them while excluding independent parties and genuinely alternative ideas. When they give equal air time to both sides of a scene so massively one-sided and unbalanced it only shows how mechanically the beeb’s commitment to herding us into left and right factions pre-ordains the content of its programming. In truth individual BBC producers are no more independent of the two-party system than they permit us to be, they just sit higher up the food chain. Like camp capos or Uncle Toms.

****

To English nationalists and others with an interest in racial issues the idea of BBC balance or producer/presenter independence is just comical, of course. I exchanged a few emails with Radio 2 DJ Alex Lester last year, his attitude demonstrates that point. The influence of the guys at Resisting Defamation can be seen:

(Lester's replies in bold)


Sent: 26 November 2008 04:37 To: Alex Lester Subject: Young, gifted and black...

Please don’t keep playing this song. I can accept the age-ism, this is after all pop music, designed to create cultural discordance between generations... but the racism? I can’t do that! You wouldn’t play a song that claimed "to be white is where it’s at" -- and you’d lose your job if you did. I get a little tired of these racist double standards.

---

> Subject: RE: Young, gifted and black...
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:41:07 +0000
> From: alex.lester@bbc.co.uk


It was a huge hit and a lot of people like it. What you are advocating is censorship. It is a song “of its time”.

---

Sent: 26 November 2008 04:49 To: Alex Lester Subject: RE: Young, gifted and black...

I am advocating a consistent non-racism, the only non-racism that isn’t racist.

Censorship would be to prevent the playing of certain records altogether, I can’t do that and wouldn’t, I simply appeal to you to stop going along with racist double standards on your show.

---

Subject: RE: Young, gifted and black...
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:03:16 +0000
From: alex.lester@bbc.co.uk


So depriving people who actually like the song of the chance to hear it! There is a formal complaints procedure at the foot of this email if you want to go that route.


---

Sent: 26 November 2008 05:14 To: Alex Lester Subject: RE: Young, gifted and black...

People who like the song would not be ‘deprived’ of it should the BBC become consistent on non-racism and cease playing it - ever heard of record stores? - but non-Black listeners would not needlessly be slurred.

The BBC is the censor, the gatekeeper; more than any other organisation it is responsible for generating the racist double standards you submit to, and complaining to the racist about racism seems pointless. I appeal to your conscience, Mr Lester: you would not play records saying the positive measure of a person is how white he is - we both know this - so why forget your moral standards and play “Young, gifted and black”?

---

> Subject: RE: Young, gifted and black...
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:20:07 +0000
> From: alex.lester@bbc.co.uk


To me it is just a song and of its time. It is in our central core of music. I will cease playing it if instructed by the BBC.